This is just mind-boggling. In one week we have three stories. First that Kerry has repeatedly referred to his alleged meeting with the UN Security Councilin an effort to undercut Bush and now we find out theat the meeting never ocurred and Kerry has lied to us repeatedly in a big way. Second we find out that Kerry's activities with the VVAW aided and abetted Hanoi, we looked upon favorably by Hanoi, and there may even have been cooperation between VVAW and Hanoi. This is generally referred to as treason. The third story is almost a non-starter. Some explosives are missing in Iraq, but it appears that they were hidden before Operation Iraqi Freedom began, in other words while the UN was still running the show.
Now which story is getting the most press? That Kerry's campaign is based on an outright lie, that Kerry may damn well have sold out his country, or a shaky story involving explosives that may not have been there in the first place?
That's right, boys and girls. The story that can be twisted to make Bush look bad is the one that prouted wings.
Please don't hand me the crap that main stream media aren't biased.